Why would they wipe the gun? And do you think they added a clip in order to make Floyd's self-defense story more plausible?

request on the fingerprints and such. Then you submitted interrogatories and production requests for documents relating to whether the gun had been wiped, etc. The judge ordered that she didn't have to answer because it might reveal her mental processes.

Is there something I am missing?

Because last I checked, protecting mental processes had to do with protecting a client or the state's strategy in an adversarial context--like in the simplest case, you can't sue to get your opponents notes on the case in order to know what they will say at trial. In this case, though, it's the right to know requests that are at issue. Allowing her to avoid producing documentation about the placement of fingerprints on the clip does nothing to protect her mental process on the right to know case. That's a pretty absurd order.

It gets deep. Sorry I missed the questions until today. Nothing about this case is as the State says it is.

christopher-king.blogspot.com/2008/05/kingcast-raises-more-troubling.htmlhttp://christopher-king.blogspot.com/2008/05/kingcast-raises-more-troubling.html

Look where Floyd shot from by the casings on the grassy knoll. He never spoke to Liko he just started blasting away as the bullet to the barn and Liko's windshield attest Floyd could not have been standing there talking to Liko before he shot him.

As to the clip, yah I think Floyd put it in himself even if Liko started to put it it after Floyd started shooting. We know for FACT that Floyd went home with one of Liko's live rounds on him.

Wait until my guy gets done with the audio. You can hear the Right channel audio faintly throughout the video because while McKay muted his mike and his 2 way radio for some reason, he forgot to turn the back seat mike off:

christopher-king.blogspot.com/2008/05/kingcast-rsa-91-request-to-kelly-ayotte.html

$2,000.00 for a radio to put on mute?

christopher-king.blogspot.com/2008/05/kingcast-asks-why-was-bruce-mckay.html

Oh, yah.

And oh forgot to say I may have looked at the guns in the wrong order, i.e. the dew on Liko's gun came from flipping it over later in the night but that still doesn't explain everything else.

And yes I disagree with the ruling.... IIRC the Court denied the Deposition Notice based on thought processes but denied the fingerprints by virtue of it not being raised in the original complaint, but traditionally in litigation things come up like that.

Now after saying she objected to the fingerprint analysis now she says she doesn't have any, which I find hard to believe.

christopher-king.blogspot.com/2008/04/kingcast-says-kelly-ayotte-and-jeffery_24.html

Also the court just ordered her to produce the homicide manual which she claims is exempt but the court hinted that it is not because it is not prepared in anticipation of litigation of any specific case. More on that soon.