Polls
Critics on NHIMC have complained the antiwar crowd isn't doing enough. What should they focus on?
Vigiling harder	(0%)
Direct action (nonviolent)	(79.4%)
Direct action (violent)	(9.0%)
More boycotts	(0.7%)
Running candidates	(1.0%)
Voting Pat Buchanan	(3.6%)
Increasing media presence	(2.9%)
Bigger demos	(0.5%)
Shutting up/stop demoralizing the troops	(1.2%)
Total votes: 413

Polls

Critics on NHIMC have complained the antiwar crowd isn't doing enough. What should they focus on?

Vigiling harder

(0%)

Direct action (nonviolent)

(79.4%)

Direct action (violent)

(9.0%)

More boycotts

(0.7%)

Running candidates

(1.0%)

Voting Pat Buchanan

(3.6%)

Increasing media presence

(2.9%)

Bigger demos

(0.5%)

Shutting up/stop demoralizing the troops

(1.2%)

Total votes: 413

Add a new comment
Title
Author	Anonymous
	Create a new account Enter a username and password which will enable you to edit this article later. You may leave these blank, but you will then not be allowed to edit the post. All fields except last name are required. First Name Last Name Username Password Email
Text Format
Comment
Anti-spam	Enter the following number into the box:
	To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Add a new comment

Title

Author

Anonymous

Create a new account

Text Format

Comment

Anti-spam

Enter the following number into the box:

To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Go, Pat, Go!

Current rating: 0
03 Nov 2005

by Nick C.

Reply to this comment

Also, Pat covered in salad dressing.

Vote early, vote often.

Current rating: 0
04 Nov 2005

by Comandante Zero

Reply to this comment

I mean, hey, I love non-violent direct action too, but how the hell did this poll get 318 votes in like two days? The indymedia editors forgot to add the option for BALLOT STUFFING.

At least this one adds up to 100%.

Come to think of it, ballot stuffing would be an effective tactic.

I just stuffed three more ballots in for Pat

Current rating: 0
04 Nov 2005

by Nick C.

Reply to this comment

I thought the software recorded the IP and prevented multiple votes from the same address. But I thought wrong. (Actually, I was thinking of the old site software, it's too bad the flashy new site software does not do this.)

PS

Current rating: 0
04 Nov 2005

by Nick C.

Reply to this comment

I just saw your response, Commandante, to the 1996 animated gif and CSS wonderland that you never displayed. It was comedy gold.

damn you editors

Current rating: 0
04 Nov 2005

by Comandante Zero

Reply to this comment

and your nefarious powers to see all!

I guess I can't actually post it because the article seems to have disappeared, dunno.

Who's voting for violent direct action?

Current rating: 0
22 Nov 2005

by Anonymous

Reply to this comment

I mean, isn't violence hypocritical in stopping a war?

Re: Who's voting for violent direct action?

Current rating: 0
22 Nov 2005

by Anonymous

Reply to this comment

It isn't hypocritical to use violent action to stop an unjust war. It's only hypocritical if you think that *any* violence is unjustifiable. Even Gandhi didn't go that far.

Quote-of-the-Moment

I say we take the oil. I don't think people realize the super-crisis mode the North Country is in. When you talk about the cost of fuel oil and how it hits a family, our average family income is half what it is down in southern New Hampshire.

-- Republican Sen. John Gallus on 'controversy' of accepting oil assistance for low income people from Citgo and the socialist government of Venezuela.

Source: The Useless Leader

Comments

Go, Pat, Go!

Vote early, vote often.

I just stuffed three more ballots in for Pat

PS

damn you editors

Who's voting for violent direct action?

Re: Who's voting for violent direct action?

Account Login

Regional News

Poll

Search

Information

Quote-of-the-Moment

Media Centers